Why the E team still isn’t excited about Xorg’s new features
This is why it’s still gonna be a while before we start to see any real benefits from Xrender/Xdamage/Composite and other such new features in Xorg:
(21:44:12) -!- raster [~raster@vagw.valinux.co.jp] has joined #edevelop
(21:44:15) -!- mode/#edevelop [+o raster] by ChanServ
(21:44:36) < @ raster> ok
(21:44:38) < @ raster> lets give xorg a run for its money
(21:45:06) < @ raster> werd
(21:45:10) < @ raster> *** ROUND 1 ***
(21:45:11) < @ raster> ---------------------------------------------------------------
(21:45:11) < @ raster> Test: Test Xrender doing non-scaled Over blends
(21:45:11) < @ raster> Time: 7.473 sec.
(21:45:11) < @ raster> ---------------------------------------------------------------
(21:45:15) < @ raster> Test: Test Xrender (offscreen) doing non-scaled Over blends
(21:45:17) < @ raster> Time: 7.460 sec.
(21:45:20) < @ raster> ---------------------------------------------------------------
(21:45:22) < @ raster> Test: Test Imlib2 doing non-scaled Over blends
(21:45:24) < @ raster> Time: 0.315 sec.
(21:45:26) < @ raster> it still sucks!
(21:45:33) <@ RbdPngn> that's ridiculous
(21:45:37) < Xenith> But not as much!
(21:45:48) <@ raster> thats the test in whihc xrender does BEST
<-- snip -->
(21:50:13) <@ raster> *** ROUND 3 ***
(21:50:13) <@ raster> ---------------------------------------------------------------
(21:50:13) <@ raster> Test: Test Xrender doing 2* smooth scaled Over blends
(21:50:13) <@ raster> Time: 105.336 sec.
(21:50:13) <@ raster> ---------------------------------------------------------------
(21:50:14) <@ raster> Test: Test Xrender (offscreen) doing 2* smooth scaled
Over blends
(21:50:16) <@ raster> Time: 105.866 sec.
(21:50:20) <@ raster> ---------------------------------------------------------------
(21:50:22) <@ raster> Test: Test Imlib2 doing 2* smooth scaled Over blends
(21:50:24) <@ raster> Time: 2.560 sec.
(21:50:26) <@ raster>
(21:50:28) <@ raster> thats a bit more like it
